Culinary Triumphs, Big Trouble, and Thanksgiving Dinner-Redux

20101004-souffle-pumpkin

Thanksgiving is right around the corner here in the USA, a day of feasting, celebration, family, friends… and of being thankful. It is also a day when cooks across the land are on the hot seat, being responsible for the central event of the day: Thanksgiving Dinner. You see, this particular dinner “must” have certain traditional components, components that you don’t usually make, and they tend to involve large numbers of eager eaters, considerably more than the home cooks of America are used to cooking for, and when you put all of this together, the pressure is on.

In our house, when there is a “company dinner” I get the cooking job. My wife is a very fine cook, but she will admit that on these occasions, she gets just a bit too nervous, as she worries about every little detail. Me? Well, let’s just say I have a bit of an attitude: “Oh, you didn’t like it? Gee, that’s a shame, but look at the bright side; it was worth every penny you paid for it!” (No pressure when you think like that.)

The only problem is that on this particular occasion, one (or more, I’m not quite sure) of my wife’s sisters will be attending, and when a sister-in-law is present, I am always told that everything MUST be perfect. Anything less than perfect and I’m in Big Trouble. Of course, there is also the “talking rules” to be observed, the off limits topics, the requirement that I agree with everything that is said and all of that… oh, and I can’t just be silent, or “everyone will think you’re mad at them.”

Have I ever mentioned that I don’t much care for social situations?

Come to think of it, there’s one more thing, and that is what I perceive as the Midwestern attitude about guys who cook. Here in the Midwest, it seems like this is considered odd, unless there is a barbeque involved, and I really wasn’t planning on roasting a turkey on a barbeque grill… out there in the snow.

Of course, that’s always been an issue, even when I was a little kid. My mother didn’t think I should be so curious about cooking, so she referred me to my father when I asked too many kitchen questions. My Dad taught me how to cook “guy stuff” like scrambled eggs, bacon and barbeque, but that wasn’t enough to satisfy my curiosity, and one time, that curiosity got me into Big Trouble.

It was a fine October afternoon when I came home from school, a bored 11 year old. My Mom left a note on the counter that said she was at the neighbor’s house and that I should do my homework and not to make a mess. I didn’t have any homework…

There was a cook book setting on the table and I started looking through it (since nobody was there to see) and I came across a section about pumpkin. There was information on how to turn a pumpkin into food that I read through; that sounded pretty easy. Hmm, we have two pumpkins for Halloween, and we only need one of them. Then I read a recipe for Pumpkin Soufflé; we had all of that stuff, and there weren’t any words I didn’t know (except soufflé).

Hmm…

I got to work. I knew that I’d best hurry because if my Mom came home before I had the soufflé completed, I’d be in trouble, but turning a pumpkin into food was harder than I expected; I pressed on. I had stringy pumpkin guts and seeds all over, but I was not deterred, and when my Mom came home, the soufflé was in the oven.

Looking back on it now, I would imagine that the neighbors heard her reaction to my little enterprise. Oh boy, I was in Big Trouble all right. The thing that concerned me the most was that my Mom left the adjudication of the matter until “Your Father Gets Home!”

That was never a good sign…

Confined to the limits of my room, I awaited my fate. My sister popped in, in strict violation of the rules and asked me what I had done. When I told her, she burst out laughing, “You idiot, you’re dead. How could you be so stupid; I can’t even do stuff like that, and I’m sixteen!” More laughter… “Your name is going to be in the obituary tomorrow idiot!”

“What’s that?”

“Where the dead people are listed, stupid!”

I wasn’t really liking my chances much, and then it happened; he was finally home.

My Dad was later than usual that day, so I got a brief reprieve because dinner was ready. The silence at the dinner table that night was palpable until my Dad said, “OK, what’s going on?”

All eyes were on my Mom as she told the story of my crimes, my sister suppressing her laughter as best she could.

My father, though stern in matters of enforcement, was a fair judge, so he said, “he made what where is it now? Let’s see it.”

When my Mom retrieved the finished soufflé, my sister gasped and then, unable to hold back her laughter, got up from the table saying, “Oh my God, you really ARE dead!”

My father, ignoring my sister’s outburst, looked at the soufflé and said, “Well, let’s see if it’s any good.” At this, I couldn’t help but notice that my mother gave him The Look.

The taste test: “Dang, that’s pretty good son, and you made this from that other pumpkin? How did you know how to do that?”

Fully realizing that my very life was hanging in the balance, I tried an unusual tactic, and told the whole truth: “I read it in Mom’s cook book, Dad.”

“And what made you decide to make Pumpkin Soufflé’ of all things?”

“Well, we had all the stuff, and the only word I didn’t know was soufflé, but that wasn’t in the directions.” Now it was my Dad who seemed to be trying not to laugh, but there was smoke coming from my mother’s ears.

“How did you manage to actually have it turn out right?” There was a hint of a smile on his face, as he seemed to struggle more and more not to laugh.

At this point, I made a crucial error, for I kept to my unusual tactic of telling the whole truth: “Well Dad, it’s just like making model airplanes; if you do exactly what the directions say, everything turns out just fine.” At that, my father could suppress his laughter no more, in fact, he actually pounded the table, he was laughing so hard. My Mom decided that she had other matters to attend to and left the room.

That’s when my sister burst back into the room: “Mom can’t make a soufflé, you idiot, they’re really hard.”

“Oh, well if I had known they were hard, I wouldn’t have made one.”

More laughter from my Dad; things banging in the next room.

My Dad handed down his ruling: I was never to do that again, I would be cleaning that kitchen, getting every single bit of pumpkin guts off the counters and floors, and I was never again to cook anything without permission… and I would pay for another pumpkin. Then he got up from the table, and with a smile and a wink, he gave me an “atta boy” pat on the back, and went into the other room to make peace with my Mom.

I was up well past my bedtime that night, scrubbing the kitchen like it had never been scrubbed before under the watchful eye of my mother. I didn’t even mind all that work; I had managed to escape the noose, hadn’t I? Within a few months, I was cooking dinners when my Mom had other things to attend to… and I have never tried a soufflé again; I hear they are way too hard!

So what does this have to do with next week’s Thanksgiving meal?

Well nothing, except that I’ve gotten in Big Trouble before in the kitchen and lived to tell the story, this shouldn’t be any big deal.

You might be wondering why I’m telling you all of this; a fair question, to be sure. You see, I’ve had another crazy idea; I thought I would post about the dinner preparations, the food, the recipes, and how it all goes… of course “richly Illustrated” with original photos.

Yeah, I know this isn’t that kind of a blog, but a little change of pace never hurt anybody. Come along for the ride, have a few laughs, and maybe we’ll see something of love, family and giving thanks along the way!

Posted in Christian Life | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

The Bread and Life

Then Jesus declared, “I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never go hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty.

John 6:35

The day before He said these words, Jesus had fed the five thousand, and now they wanted Him to do it again. But Jesus had not come to earth to be a meal ticket; He had a much more important mission than that.

In the ancient Near East, bread was a symbol of life, for if you had a loaf of bread, you would not starve that day; Jesus was intent of giving Himself so that Mankind could live not for a single day, or even a week, but for all eternity. Yet, there is a catch!

We must go to Him in belief; we must accept the gift of grace He offers.

Most of the people who had gathered on that day long ago did not accept His gift, yet it is still available to us today… will we receive it? Each person must decide that for him or herself in this life. For those of us who have accepted His gift of eternal life already there is a second question to be answered: Will we share the gift, or will we keep it for ourselves only?

Of course all who read this already know their answer: Who will we share Jesus with today?

Posted in Christian Life | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Random Ramblings: November 19, 2016

First off today, a bit of “housekeeping”: By the time this posts, Cathy and I should just about be arriving at a warm and sunny seashore where we will enjoy a week of relaxation on a beautiful beach. As a result, I will be absent from this chair for the forthcoming week. However, you will hardly notice as I have scheduled posts for each day at the typical times. No doubt you will notice a repeat of last year’s “Thanksgiving week” posts that chronicle my adventures in getting ready for the big day… I had fun writing those, I must say. Please feel free to leave your comments, but they may take a while to show up… Beginning on Monday November 28, I will begin a short series of posts on the prophet Joel.

With that out of the way, I wanted to share something with you that took place in my local small group the other night. Two weeks ago our group anointed one of our members in prayer for an upcoming surgery to remove a kidney that appeared to be cancerous. The following Friday the surgery was completed, and last week it was confirmed malignant. The interesting thing was that the surgery was on Friday and he was in church on Sunday, and then subsequent tests revealed that there is no sign of any lingering cancer and he has, as I understand it, a clean bill of health.

Then last week, we again prayed with a member about a chronic knee condition, and by the following Sunday it was gone. The other night we were discussing how amazing our God is when His people pray big prayers with boldness and faith that he will keep his promises.

I really don’t have much more to say on the subject other than to ask a simple question:

If we believe that God answers prayer, and if we believe that God keeps His promises, then why do we spend so much of time doubting Him, and why are we surprised when He comes through?

And with that, I’ll say see you in a week or so, and have a great Thanksgiving!

Posted in Random thoughts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

And We are His

“Shout for joy to the LORD, all the earth. 
  Worship the LORD with gladness; 
   come before him with joyful songs. 
Know that the LORD is God. 
   It is he who made us, and we are his; 
   we are his people, the sheep of his pasture.”

Psalm 100:1-3

Is there a better Thanksgiving message than that?  I doubt it.

He has made us, we are His, we are His people, we are His joy…

As we continue with our preparations for Thursday, as we deal with the last-minute, the anticipation… oh and the weather in many areas, I hope that we might also keep our joy in Him close to our hearts.  I would be willing to guess that for most people, were they to literally make a list of what they are thankful for this year, they might overlook this point.  I can hardly blame them, for I too might overlook it; that’s usually what we do with the obvious. Let’s keep in mind that just because our joy in Him is obvious, that does not make it trivial, for to the contrary, it is profound!

May we grab on to this and hold it tight this Thanksgiving: He made us and we are His. I firmly believe that the more we hold this  in our hearts, the more complete our joy will be. .

Posted in Christian Life | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

“OK Don, what is your point?”

That is certainly a fair question, especially when you consider the fact that I’ve been writing about politics on a blog that isn’t about politics. Yes, you deserve an explanation, and here it is:

We have all been hearing, and indeed many of us have been asking questions like the following:

Why was the campaign so nasty? Why are recent elections so very close? Why is there “gridlock” in Washington and nothing ever gets done? Why are so many people so angry? Why is the news coverage so slanted? Whatever happened to compromise? Where are the leaders and statesmen? On and on it goes, and there is an answer to all of these questions.

The history of men “under the sun” ebbs and flows. There is an established order of things, and then a new movement comes along. Compromises are made by statesmen who rise to the challenges of their times, but sooner or later there are no more compromises left to be made and the result is gridlock. In those times, things drag on for a time, and then one side or the other wins; a new order is established or an old one is preserved peacefully, while other times the result is war.

Here are two examples from American history; if you are not American, perhaps you will think of examples from your country’s past…

In Colonial America, there was an established order of things until the “classical liberalism” of the Enlightenment gained wide acceptance in the colonies. When that happened, it ran headlong into the Imperial might of the British Government and it became clear fairly quickly, all things considered, that there were no compromises to be made. The only option left was war, and the colonies won independence from Britain, establishing a new order of things in America in the late 18th century. Sadly however, things soon became difficult as it became more and more obvious that there had developed two distinct worldviews in the new Nation that revolved around the Institution of Slavery. Through the early 19th century, compromises were made by statesmen who worked tirelessly to hold the new Republic together, but in the middle of that century it became clear that all of the available compromises had been made; it was time for one side or the other to win, and once again war resulted and slavery was abolished as a result.

By the late 19th century, a new worldview was developing that came to be known as Progressivism. This new worldview ran headlong into the checks and balances put in place by the classical liberals of the early Republic. Throughout the 20th century these two ideologies faced off both in America and Europe in a somewhat different way as the local “order” was faced with one form or another of new ideology, each country dealing with it in its own way. In America, statesmen arose and compromises were made, but by the early 21st century it has become more and more evident that there are no more compromises to be made, and gridlock has taken hold; politics has become very nasty indeed. Faced with difficult challenges both at home and abroad, somebody needs to win, hopefully peacefully, or the Nation cannot move forward; this is the dirty little secret that no one is willing to utter in public.

In this climate, Donald Trump donned the mask of a Populist and ran a protest candidacy to take advantage of the fact that a great number of Americans has lost patience with gridlock and respect for Washington. He challenged the pervasive atmosphere of political correctness and won the White House. Yet when the mask of the campaign finally comes off on January 20th, who will we have elected: A classical liberal or an uber Progressive?

Only the President Elect knows for sure.

This dear reader is why things are as they are, at least in my view. Obviously you are welcome to see things differently.

In case I am using terms you aren’t familiar with here, a “classical liberal” can be described simply as someone who believes in and places a high priority on individual liberty and limited government. Ironically, in modern day parlance we call them “Conservative”. Progressives, again simply stated, are those who believe in and place a high priority on governmental activism to manage and solve the country’s challenges to bring about a better society, and once again ironically, we refer to this as “liberal” in our time. I hope you have noticed that I did not say “Republican” or “Democrat”, and I didn’t because there are both views represented in both parties, as well as in independent parties; this is an ideological struggle, not a partisan one.

Finally, having spent so many years of my life researching this, I thought I would create a series of posts in the form of a weekly “feature” on this blog to trace the history and development of Progressivism. I’m thinking that these posts would run on Sunday afternoons beginning in January so that anyone who is interested in such things might have the opportunity to get an introduction to the subject from which they can begin their own adventure of research, without interfering with our “regular programming”.

Any thoughts?

Posted in Christian Life | Tagged , , , , , , , | 29 Comments

A Final Tale from my Youth

In the last couple of days, I’ve told you two tales from my youth and now I will tell you a third and final youthful adventure of mine. In my next post later today, I’ll tell you why I’ve told you…

In my final undergraduate year, back in the late 70’s, I got a job in politics working for a certain candidate for governor of a certain large state working in “opposition research”. This was a perfect position for me as a student… and the opponent was a colorful character to be sure. Sadly however I quickly became bored with researching pot smoking and long weekends with a certain well-known singer in a low key apartment away from the capitol city of the state; I wasn’t all that interested in tabloid gossip… and neither was our candidate. I was assigned some different research, that of analyzing our opponent’s public remarks and comparing them with the remarks of other candidates nationwide of the same political party with the hope that our guy could say that our opponent was “extremist”. As a soon to graduate Communication major, I dived into the project. Sadly however, what I found was that our opponent wasn’t extreme in his party at all, and was actually in his party’s mainstream, for his party had shifted more in the preceding few years than anyone had noticed.

What I discovered was a shift in language however, a shift that followed a common pattern, and the common pattern was that those candidates were calling certain things by names that described something else. Here’s an example: In that particular election cycle, one of the major parties was harping about “working families”. When I took these speeches and outlined them into a communication brief, the structural contexts revealed that “working families” was parallel to “making less than $30,000 per year.” They got away with this by never mentioning the two in the same paragraph, and working families who earned that much thought these guys were championing them. They didn’t realize that they were those nasty “rich” that were going to get hosed after the election… until it was too late. There were dozens of other examples of this that year, and our campaign never figured out how to counter this subterfuge. That experience got me thinking…

After the election, I began doing some more political research, research that would take me more than a decade to complete; I really should have written a book.

My research led to something fascinating that in America was called “Progressivism”, and which has counterparts in most Western countries. It developed from the mid 19th century into the early 20th century and has only been tweaked a time or two since. What is really fascinating about it is that it developed largely in universities and was written about and discussed lavishly for many years; in other words, the whole development of the movement took place in a “publish or perish” academic environment. Thus, it is possible to study every single word of its development and substance… and that is what took me so long to get through it. Oh yes, if you are a history geek like me, Progressivism is a geek’s heaven.

Or maybe a geek’s nightmare.

Using words to describe things that are different from what the words mean has been written about by great scholars as a way to convince the ignorant masses of “common men” to go along with the program (for their own good, you understand). To be sure, in the mid and late 19th century the expression “common man” was a pejorative, not a compliment. You would be amazed at what I discovered, and it’s all available for anyone to read… but hardly anyone does.

The most amazing thing of all is that so very little has changed since Progressivism went mainstream in the early 20th century.

Taking possible options out of play by describing a spectrum with only socialist possibilities is a Progressive tactic, political correctness is too, and you should see how many have written about the greatest dream of the early Progressives: Negating the US Constitution by teaching the young that it is organic, that it lives and breathes and that its meaning changes with the times.

I discovered one other thing, that there really isn’t any such thing as socialism, at least not as a single socio-political or economic structure. Instead it is a worldview that encompasses a whole family of political theory. Thus, If socialism can be described as “left of center” than the political spectrum I was taught: Far Left = Communism, Center = Western Social Democracy and Far Right = Fascism is only the left part of the actual political spectrum, and what I was taught in school really was a pernicious lie. But then why would that be a surprise, after all the early Progressives wrote a great deal about what they termed “the convenient lie”.

Therefore, as we try to figure out what to expect in the wake of our recent election, both in the USA and elsewhere, please understand one thing: As Scripture teaches, nothing in this world is what it appears to be, and the election and its aftermath are no exception. You see dear reader, both candidates are Progressives, even though Mrs. Clinton was the only one who said so (right after the Convention in a joint appearance with Bernie Sanders). Mr. Trump in answering every problem with how he’s going to fix it, and fast, is taking the approach of the Progressives as well.

Oh my but we live in interesting times.

Later on, I’ll tell you why I just mentioned all of this stuff; be there if you dare!

Posted in Christian Life | Tagged , , , , , , | 19 Comments

Poli Sci 256

p00111016007-lp

NOTE: This post is the second part of a short series. For best results, you might want to read part 1 if you haven’t already had the chance.

As a college undergrad, I had to take a semester of political science so I reluctantly decided to get it out of the way early. I was reluctant because of my experience in high school government class that I related yesterday; I was very wary of what I would be taught. Yet since then, I had read an awful lot of books on government and politics, books from Das Kapital by Marx, to Rules for Radicals by Alinsky… to Mein Kampf by Hitler. Did I forget to mention that I was a geek in school? Oh yes, if I wasn’t on a baseball or football field, I was reading something… anything… pretty much everything I could get my hands on. Could that be why I was never much of a social success?

On the very first day of the semester, I sat down in Poli Sci 256 and waited. The instructor entered the room, a graduate assistant only a few years older than I was. When the time came, she stood and gave us her name and office number, and then handed out the syllabus. Of course she called off all of the names on the cards for each student to ensure everyone who was registered for the class was present, reminded us of the drop dates, and then began. The first thing she said in a class lecture was this:

“I am a socialist, and by the time the semester is over, you will be too.”

This class was going to be a drag…

For the next 20 weeks I heard a great deal about how the multi-national corporations and the military-industrial complex were oppressing the proletariat and how the ruling Capitalist classes were laying waste to not only the masses, but even to the planet itself in their constant efforts to amass obscene fortunes and world domination. Oh yes, I learned how these detestable pette bourgeois elements and their reactionary allies were the very scourge of America and a threat to our very futures as students and other enlightened people. Lucky for me I had spent a year and a half devouring books on politics; this, actually very nice, young lady was a little more than just a socialist. Come to think of it, what she was teaching would be closer to Stalinist than anything else. Of course, she also spent a lot of time talking about that political spectrum: Left-Center-Right.

Nevertheless, on the two midterms, I regurgitated what she wanted to see… Then came the final. The good news was that she told our class that we need not study anything.

On the day of the final exam, we were directed to move the desks to the sides of the room, and arrange our chairs into a circle. Then we were told that we will each have three minutes to answer the following statement:

“Why I am a socialist.”

I quickly calculated that I had about 30 minutes before it was my turn… what should I say?

When I was called on, I said something like this:

“I am a socialist because socialism will provide me with food, clothing, a place to live, education, medical care and security.” (I thought it might be a nice touch to follow directions a little bit). I continued: “Of course these are the things I would get if I were in prison, but I do not want to be in prison. What if I want a yacht, or a nice car? Socialism as we’ve learned about it, cannot, must not show me that kind of favoritism; I do not want favoritism, all I want is the chance to achieve my dreams.

“As we’ve learned it, socialism cannot give me that chance.

“If the socialist system cannot allow me that chance, then like any good revolutionary, I will seize the chance to achieve my dreams. I may not succeed, but I would rather die in the effort than be made to live the life of an inmate.”

The students who had gone ahead of me all had nice reasons for being socialists; those who went after seemed to like the “die trying” approach…See what happens when you let a kid read whatever they want?

Yes that’s right; they become “counter-revolutionary hooligans” just like I did!

On that particular day, I wasn’t doing anything other than responding to what I perceived to be a pernicious lie. That lie had nothing to do with socialism per se, it was about presenting a very limited set of data that was represented as complete, and setting up a predetermined conclusion. Ironically, in both this and the high school examples, it was done by instructors who were both big advocates of “academic freedom”. I learned that academic freedom didn’t apply to me, unless I was very careful. (This was also true when I was a professor.)

It is also true that without realizing it at the time; I broke the “groupthink” of the class simply by providing an alternative that fit within the narrative of the instructor, which was radical action. The students who followed me wanted their chance to realize their dreams too and 20 weeks of pure propaganda went out the window; I learned much in that class.

Afterwards, I was invited to a private audience in the instructor’s office the next day…

…where I learned that she had been “impressed” with my revolutionary zeal, even though she had been “disappointed” by my “capitalist self-centeredness”. I received an “A” in the class anyway.

In the recent election, did you hear terms like “right wing” and “reactionary” and “extremist” used? I did. Have you noticed how certain political groups are so shocked and dismayed at the outcome? I have; even the EU is holding an “emergency summit” to discuss the situation…

On a much larger scale than in my Poli Sci class, Donald Trump has broken the groupthink; many political insiders are shaken to the core, but it really isn’t because of his policies (whatever they are), it’s because he didn’t follow the rules of “political correctness”. Nothing in this world is what it appears to be.

Tomorrow I’ll tell you another story from my youth. If you are brave, I’ll see you then!

Posted in Christian Life | Tagged , , , , , , , | 17 Comments

The Cry of My Heart

Featured Image -- 8459

How lovely is your dwelling place,
Lord Almighty!
My soul yearns, even faints,
for the courts of the Lord;
my heart and my flesh cry out
for the living God.

Psalm 84:1-2

What does your soul yearn for what does your heart cry out for?

I would imagine there are many possibilities.

As I sit here this morning thinking about it, this might be the question above all questions, the answer to which will tell us everything about ourselves. If my soul yearns for earthly things, say money or status or power, maybe for drugs or drink, possibly for love and romance… what would that say about my spiritual condition?

Yes indeed, there are so many possible answers…

Why is it that my soul cries out for God when I find myself in trouble, but when all seems well, things other than God have my attention? Oh yes, that says something about my spiritual condition!

I want to say that my heart and soul cry out for God, but if that were true, what would my daily life look like; would it look the same as it does now? Hmmm…

The things of this life are all around us, the pleasures of this life call out. The problems of this life are all around us as well; they aren’t easy to miss: The things of this life are ubiquitous in fact, and if my attention is to be on the things that are above, maybe I’m going to need to decide consciously to put it there, instead of on the things of this life. Yes, maybe I’m going to need to put my attention on God purposefully, deliberately as a choice I make. After all, don’t our hearts and souls yearn for the things were pay attention to?

Posted in Christian Life | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Photo of the Week: November 16, 2016

Posted in Photo of the Week | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Nothing in this World is What it Appears to Be

I’ve pointed this out many times here when speaking of the world in which we live, particularly in Biblical passages that deal with spiritual warfare; nowhere is this truer than in show business and politics.

Of course show business is obvious, especially when speaking about television and movies; what you see on the screen that looks so real actually isn’t. When the scene is over and the director says “cut”, the dead man gets up from the floor and goes to lunch!

For many of us, politics seems obvious as well, for ask anyone and they’ll tell you that they don’t believe a politician’s promise, but then that isn’t actually a true statement. Oh yes, everybody says that, but then ask them why they voted for or against so and so, and you’ll discover that they really do believe what was said.

What makes politics not what they appear to be is somewhat more serious.

Maybe Mr. Trump was right about one thing: The game really is rigged… but not in the way he meant it. Here’s what I mean by that:

Many years ago when I had government in high school, the teacher insisted that we accept the notion that there was this political spectrum out there that contained all of the ideas and notions about politics and government. On that “political spectrum” there was communism on the far left, fascism on the far right, and something called “Western social democracy” in the middle. Then, as any good teacher would do, she defined her terms. Since I was quite good at being a student, I wrote down and later memorized her definitions; they always appeared on exams…

“Communism is where the State owns the means of production, and where the State controls the means of production. Fascism is where the means of production are privately owned, but controlled by the State, and Western social democracies are where the means of production are owned privately and regulated by the State.”

I will never forget those definitions as long as I live… nor will I ever forget what came next.

“Which one are we?” asked one of my more clueless classmates.

“We are in the middles,” was her reply, “although the Europeans are better at it because we still have reactionary elements holding us back. Reactionary elements are ignorant people on the far right wing.” I simply couldn’t help myself:

“Doesn’t that mean that Western social democracies are fascist wannabe’s?” said I.

In reply, I was given small pink piece of paper which referred me to the care and custody of the Boy’s Vice Principal. Later that afternoon as I was serving my sentence as a slave for the school janitor, I thought about this some more. The thought that struck me as I was mopping the halls that afternoon was that every possibility in that spectrum supposedly containing all political and governmental possibilities was socialist to one degree or another. I decided that while I will regurgitate her definitions on exams, I will never believe them; there are simply too many other possibilities for that Left-Right model to be correct, including the U.S. Constitution. I did however ask my government teacher where a Monarchical Oligarchy like say, Czarist Russia would be on the spectrum (I remembered to raise my hand and not sound like a smart-alek that time) and she told me that they were fascist. That’s when I knew that I was on to something big.

It would be quite some time before I understood just how powerful it is to control the list of possible options in politics, science, philosophy, theology… or life in general, for you see dear reader, I had unwittingly begun to discover propaganda.

At this same time tomorrow, I’d like to tell you about the one and only political science course I took in college; you’re going to love this, see you then.

Posted in Christian Life | Tagged , , , , , , | 11 Comments