Bad Moon Rising

“Yet the Israelites will be like the sand on the seashore, which cannot be measured or counted. In the place where it was said to them, ‘You are not my people,’ they will be called ‘children of the living God.’  The people of Judah and the people of Israel will come together; they will appoint one leader and will come up out of the land, for great will be the day of Jezreel. “Say of your brothers, ‘My people,’ and of your sisters, ‘My loved one.’

Hosea 1:10-11; 2:1

In the original Hebrew, this is how our text should look. I mention this because realizing it allows us to carry the context forward, making what follows much easier to understand. You will recall that chapter 1 ended with a long view to the time when the Son of God would restore the unity of God’s people, both Northern and Southern Kingdoms, both Jew and Gentile; that thought actually moves all the way into chapter 2, as you can see. Yet before we see this image again, we find a new series of warnings.

Unlike chapter 1, with it’s image of Hosea’s marriage to Gomer, here we see Israel (the mother) and her children (brother and sister)…

“Rebuke your mother, rebuke her,
for she is not my wife,
and I am not her husband.
Let her remove the adulterous look from her face
and the unfaithfulness from between her breasts.
Otherwise I will strip her naked
and make her as bare as on the day she was born;
I will make her like a desert,
turn her into a parched land,
and slay her with thirst. (2:2-3)

Israel had turned away from God and entered into the worship of the pagan idol Baal. Thus, Israel had committed adultery, spiritual adultery. Hosea’s imagery is that of a father pleading with his children to bring their mother home, for if she did not repent, there would be serious repercussions from her act of infidelity.  If we step back from the imagery and look at the national situation, God is pleading with anyone in Israel who has remained faithful to Him to plead with their countrymen to repent, for if the people did not turn away from this outrage against God, National disaster would be the result: That is Hosea’s actual message here.

I will not show my love to her children,
because they are the children of adultery.
Their mother has been unfaithful
and has conceived them in disgrace.
She said, ‘I will go after my lovers,
who give me my food and my water,
my wool and my linen, my olive oil and my drink.’ (2:4-5)

A Nation is made up of its people, and in the case of Israel, it was the people, the vast majority of the people, who had gone after the false gods. It would seem that they have done so because they felt their needs were better met by these false gods, and thus, they indulged. Consequently, the warning Hosea is delivering here is that not only will this be a National disaster, but it will get very personal for those who have entered into adultery against God by taking on idolatrous worship.

Therefore I will block her path with thornbushes;
I will wall her in so that she cannot find her way.
She will chase after her lovers but not catch them;
she will look for them but not find them.
Then she will say,
‘I will go back to my husband as at first,
for then I was better off than now.’
She has not acknowledged that I was the one
who gave her the grain, the new wine and oil,
who lavished on her the silver and gold—
which they used for Baal. (2:6-8)

Israel seemed to think the grass would be greener worshipping Baal, God wasn’t terribly amused, and will withhold from the people what they thought they could get from their “lover”. Soon they would realize that they had been better off before they fell into idolatry. They would try to return home, but would they be ready to acknowledge that it had been God who provided everything they needed all along?

It’s too soon to know, after all, this is only chapter 2!

Posted in Bible | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

TLP Living: July 2, 2018

The first Beatitude speaks of those who are “poor in spirit”. Much has been made about the difference between Matthew’s language and that of Luke in Luke 6:20, for Luke merely says “the poor”. Does Matthew have more in mind than mere economic circumstances?

I’m happy to let others argue, but it seems to me that Matthew, a Jew, might be aware of the Old Testament idea of poverty not only in literal terms, but as a state of mind, for the Hebrew word for “poor” has this additional connotation to it. In those days, a poor person not only had to deal with bad economic circumstances, they also had to contend with the fact that they had fewer rights in society, for then as now, they lacked the resources to enforce their rights; consequently, they were at the mercy of others.

Living in such a state made it clear to anyone who could fathom the notion, that the poor must depend entirely upon God. Most of us today, even those of us who don’t enjoy material abundance, live in circumstances far better than those of a poor person in ancient times, and maybe we too have a hard time seeing what Matthew means; let’s look at it this way: In our world, a person of very limited means is never far from being destitute, while a rich person has a much larger buffer to get through tough times. The poor person knows they live close to the edge; the rich person can convince himself that everything is wonderful, that he is the master of his own life, and in doing so, he only deceives himself, for God is the master of everything. We see time and again in Scripture that a rich person has a great obstacle to overcome in following God, for he thinks he is the one in control, while a poor man has no such delusion to overcome, and no great wealth to hold him back. The poor person is free to follow the Lord, while the rich person carries his wealth as a millstone around his neck; woe is he.

The kingdom of heaven is both a present reality and a future hope, for it is with us today in Christ, and will be fully realized in its ultimate fulfillment when He returns. For the person who recognizes his or her current dependence upon God for everything in life, it is a present reality indeed, and a source of great joy, “for theirs truly is the kingdom of heaven.”

Posted in current events | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

TLP Inspiration: July 2, 2018

Good Monday from the Heartland.

The path of life is not a wide one that is full of traffic and congestion, it is quieter than that.  It isn’t a great highway, it’s more like a quiet country lane…

Maybe if your life’s path is full of noise and traffic you should take the next exit and get on that other road.

As you walk along, you come across many things, some are beautiful, some not.  There are turns, twists, hills and dips. Sometimes you come across a cool and refreshing stream, other times you go a long way in the hot sun, with dust and bugs all around.  As you move along you come across places where you can’t see much because of the high brush on either side… and then there’s a fork and you must decide which way to go.

On such a lane you might want to notice the footprints of those who’ve gone before.  If they have gone one way at the fork in the path, you get the idea that this is the way to follow…

There have been many who have gone down the path of life before us, and the legacy they left for us was to follow the footprints of the One who made the path in the first place; following those footsteps will get us to the end of life’s path, right where there is a little narrow gate: Go through that gate and enter in to eternal life, for Jesus has told us all about it:

“Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.

Matt. 7:13-14

Yes, when you get to the gate go right on in, those who have gone before, and the One who made the path will be glad to see you’ve made it home.

Posted in Christian living | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Sunday Sermon Notes: July 1, 2018

Title: Jesus, Sinners and Critics

Text: Mark 2:1-17

Jesus Meets His Critics

Mark 2:1-12

Parallel Texts: Matthew 9:2-8; Luke 5:17-26

In this passage, Jesus has returned to Capernaum from His Kingdom Tour, and the people are excited to have Him back in town. During this period, Capernaum is His ‘home base’. As the crowd grew with the usual curious listeners, sick and damaged people, it became impossible for everyone to gain entry into the house where Jesus was staying as He preached, and a very enterprising group of men climbed up to the roof, bringing a paralyzed man on a stretcher with them. They opened the roof door which was a common feature in those flat-roofed houses, and lowered the paralyzed man into the room where Jesus was teaching.

When Jesus saw this, He went over to the man on the stretcher and told him that his sins were forgiven.

There was a group of teachers of the law in the room, who may have come from Jerusalem to investigate the report that had reached the city about the Kingdom Tour, and these guys were pretty amazed at what they saw. It occurred to them that Jesus had just made a mistake in telling the unfortunate man his sins were forgiven, because only God can forgive sins: Blasphemy… Gotcha!

Immediately Jesus knew in his spirit that this was what they were thinking in their hearts, and he said to them, “Why are you thinking these things? Which is easier: to say to this paralyzed man, ‘Your sins are forgiven,’ or to say, ‘Get up, take your mat and walk’? But I want you to know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins.” So he said to the man, “I tell you, get up, take your mat and go home.” He got up, took his mat and walked out in full view of them all. This amazed everyone and they praised God, saying, “We have never seen anything like this!”

Mark 2:8-12

I love this part! Jesus, knowing their thoughts goes over to these guys and asks a question: So boys, what’s easier, to tell this guy his sins are forgiven, or to tell him to get up, pick up his mat and walk?

Who says Jesus had no sense of humor?

Then, He went back to the paralyzed man and told him to get up, take his mat and walk… and that’s just what the guy did!

I can just imagine what those old boys from Jerusalem thought then… hilarious! Boy, did they have a report for the bigwigs back home.

Of course everyone was amazed at what they had witnessed, but I wonder if they fully comprehended the scene. Right in front of the teachers of the law, Jesus had forgiven a man’s sins, the teachers were correct in what they were thinking, for only God can forgive sins. Jesus read their thoughts; a little miracle nobody seemed to notice, and went right for the jugular, so to speak. He told a paralyzed man to get up and walk, and the man was made whole again, and did just that. Thus, Jesus had taken upon Himself God’s role to forgive, and then backed it up by making the man whole physically.

Wholeness, spiritually and physically: Jesus removed the consequences of sin, at least symbolically , right in front of their eyes. To state what happened in another way, Jesus had just shown the whole crowd that He was the Son of God… and the teachers of the law, by definition if nothing else, would have had to know that.

So, what do you think was in their report to HQ?

Jesus and Sinners

Mark 2:13-17

Parallel Texts: Matthew 9:9; Luke 5:27-28

Still in Galilee, Jesus calls another disciple, and this time He has a questionable choice: Levi (Matthew) the tax collector. Tax collectors are none too popular in our day, but back then they were outright crooks in most cases. They would be informed of the amount they had to collect, and whatever they collected over and above that amount would be theirs to keep. Oh yes, this was all nice and legal under Roman law. So say you are a tax collector and you are supposed to collect $100.00 from 10 people. Let’s see, if you can get $10.00 from each one, you could turn the money over to the authorities and be done, but your family would go hungry. If you collected $ 12.50 each, you’d make $25.00 and maybe that would be fair, but if you could force them to pay $150.00 each, even better!

So, let’s see; where was I? Oh yes, they were unpopular indeed!

Jesus called Levi to discipleship, and then they go to a party with tax collectors and other unsavory characters: The stage is set for another round with His critics.

Posted in Sunday Class Notes | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

TLP Inspiration: June 30, 2018

Truth

Does the truth really count for anything anymore? Does anybody really care, or is the truth just whatever it seems like to me?

Does government tell us the truth about anything, say the economy for instance?  Do athletes tell the truth about steroids? How about the news media, are they telling the truth about the stories they report?

Well, I can’t say, for there is clearly enough falsehood flying around out there that when people do tell the truth you really have to wonder…

So, what is truth?

We aren’t the first people to ask this question; in fact, it’s as old as the Scriptures.  It’s a question that Pilate asked Jesus two thousand years ago. (John 18:38) Jesus told Pilate that He “came into the world to testify to the truth.” He also taught us  that He is “The way, the truth and the life”  (John 14:6)

As Christians there is one thing that we can be certain of: Jesus is Truth; His words are true.  We need to keep this in mind as we see and hear the world around us proclaim “alternate” truths.  If these “truths” are in conflict with the teachings and person of Christ, they are falsehoods. As we listen to newscasts talk about things that are in conflict with what Jesus taught… we know what to conclude.

The truth is that very little in this world is what it appears to be! This is the lesson of Scripture and it is the lesson of history, and it is the first rule of understanding our world.

We can place our faith and our trust in Jesus− all else is questionable.

Posted in Christian living | Tagged , , , , , , , | 12 Comments

A Few Final Thoughts

NOTE: I am writing this piece on Thursday morning because pursuant to the commends of She Who Must Be Obeyed, by the time this posts I will be in a nearby state visiting her sister. Consequently, I will not have seen many of your comments and I hope you don’t think I’m ignoring any points that have been made.

Last time I ended with 2 questions for the group, and unlike our previous sessions, I’d like to answer them too. They were:

  1. Why is it called, in Protestant circles anyway, a worship “service”?
  2. Is it possible for our group to come together to worship as one Body despite our different opinions, likes and dislikes?

As for the first one, our Sunday worship is called a “service” because when we are in community with other Christians, service is our worship. That is both service to God and service to each other, and it takes a great many forms from giving God the praise He is due, to serving the needs of those who are hurting. Service is worship, service is love in action, and love in action is worship− this is what it means to live as Jesus lived. We don’t do this because we are compelled to do so; it isn’t The Law. Rather, it is our natural response to His love and to His amazing grace by which we have received everything in Christ.

Since this service is the result of our love for both God and those around us, it is selfless and humble in its nature, it does not keep a scorecard, and we desire nothing in return. Thus, we offer ourselves as living sacrifices to God.

Now for my answer to the second question: Can we worship together as One in spite of our diversity? Of course we can! You see, if we can take care of question 1, question 2 will take care of itself.

The only problem is that most Christians never get through the first question. Sadly, most of our leaders haven’t either, so we aren’t led to do so. It seems so daunting, so we say this can’t happen until Jesus returns, but in doing so we must ignore the fact that New Testament teaching on this whole subject is usually found to be in the present tense imperative, thus it is something we should be working at in the here and now.

Over two years ago, I wrote some posts about nakedness as a metaphor in Scripture. The real idea was that we need to be naked before God. No, this isn’t really about a wild new dress code, it’s about baring our souls before God. When we talk about baring our souls before God it tends to sound sort of academic or abstract, but when we compare it to baring our bodies well, it gets real for most people in a hurry; thus, the metaphor. Starting next week, I’m going to revisit that study making improvements and corrections where needed, not to mention some additions that have come to mind since then.

The reason for this, is that it explains how we get from a typical point of beginning to the place where we can truly offer ourselves as living sacrifices, pleasing to God as our perfect and true worship (service) to God. You will recognize that it has many of the elements we covered in our recent study of spiritual practices, only in a metaphorical setting that gets us to where the rubber meets the road.

I hope to see you then!

Posted in Christian living | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

Hosea Gets Married

Hosea 1

We begin Hosea’s story with a time stamp in verse 1. If you were wondering where I got the dates that I used in the Introduction, this is it. It’s also interesting to notice the language used at the very beginning: “The word of the Lord that came to Hosea”. The Hebrew string here is the same wording that would be used to describe “possession” as in demon possession. Thus, we can see that there is a great difference between being indwelt by the Holy Spirit, as we are in Christ, and having the Spirit come upon a prophet of old. From that, we move quickly into the narrative.

When the Lord began to speak through Hosea, the Lord said to him, “Go, marry a promiscuous woman and have children with her, for like an adulterous wife this land is guilty of unfaithfulness to the Lord.”  So he married Gomer daughter of Diblaim, and she conceived and bore him a son. (1:2-3)

The word that the NIV translates as “promiscuous” means “adultery, fornication, prostitute.”  The old translations, certainly the KJV, takes this woman to be a prostitute (harlot), but to be fair to all concerned in the story, this was to be a “loose” woman who may or may not have actually been in business. Most likely, when she married Hosea, Gomer hadn’t yet been any of those things.

Whatever the exact case may have been, this is where we run into the controversy about the marriage: Is it literal or allegory? Earlier I said that I don’t think it matters all that much, unless the reader is a very strict literalist; here’s why. If Hosea literally married someone of dubious character named Gomer, and they had kids and so on, their story is clearly a metaphor for God and His relationship with the Northern Kingdom, Israel− this is almost impossible to deny. However, if you not only take the story as being of real people, but also insist that it cannot have a metaphorical element because metaphor isn’t, strictly speaking, literal, then it is only a side note to the rest of the book. For me, that’s simply silly.

Anyway, I’m more than pleased to let others argue that one; I’ll be discussing the metaphorical elements of the story as we continue.

Gomer has three children, the first, is a son:

Then the Lord said to Hosea, “Call him Jezreel, because I will soon punish the house of Jehu for the massacre at Jezreel, and I will put an end to the kingdom of Israel. In that day I will break Israel’s bow in the Valley of Jezreel.” (1:4-5)

(Jezreel means “to sow.) Jehu came to power with the rise of Baal worship in Israel, essentially, the people of Israel had committed adultery in turning away from God to the idolatry of the Baalites; God was something less than amused by this infidelity.

Gomer conceived again and gave birth to a daughter. Then the Lord said to Hosea, “Call her Lo-Ruhamah (which means “not loved”), for I will no longer show love to Israel, that I should at all forgive them. Yet I will show love to Judah; and I will save them—not by bow, sword or battle, or by horses and horsemen, but I, the Lord their God, will save them.” (1:6-7)

They had a daughter who was named “not loved” because God would not love Israel for what they had sown when they decided to turn away from Him.  Yet God would continue to love Judah, the Southern kingdom, for they, although having problems of their own, had not been adulterous in their dealings with God.

Do you see how this is working? The characters in the story are the prophecy concerning the fate of the Northern kingdom. If these are all literal humans, God isn’t taking out His righteous indignation on them personally; they would live as anyone else. Yet their names actually are prophetic for the Nation. Got it?

Another son comes along:

After she had weaned Lo-Ruhamah, Gomer had another son.  Then the Lord said, “Call him Lo-Ammi (which means “not my people”), for you are not my people, and I am not your God. (1:8-9)

The rebellion of Israel has become so outrageous that God is terminating His Covenant with them. I say this realizing that some who read it will find it difficult to swallow: “God can’t do that− He is always faithful and keeps His promises!” See, that’s the thing, He always keeps His promises… The Law of Moses has 613 laws (commands). Each carries blessings and curses that we call “promises”. If they keep His commands, God will bless the people in various ways, but if they break His commands, God will judge them in various ways. The Israelites by this time had completely turned their backs on God, and He is bound by the Law to turn His back on them, for they have gone way beyond simply slipping into sin for a time; they have abrogated their covenant with Him. Thus, in what He is about to do, God is being faithful to His promises to them.

Yeah I know; they don’t really teach this in Sunday School do they?

However, not all the news is bad for the people…

“Yet the Israelites will be like the sand on the seashore, which cannot be measured or counted. In the place where it was said to them, ‘You are not my people,’ they will be called ‘children of the living God.’ The people of Judah and the people of Israel will come together; they will appoint one leader and will come up out of the land, for great will be the day of Jezreel. (1:10-11)

The people of Israel had earned God’s coming judgment; they were going to pay a steep price for what they had done. Yet another day would dawn, a day of Salvation and redemption for the people. Yes indeed, this is a messianic element, for the day would come when all of God’s people would be joined together in the Kingdom of God when His Son would bring grace for all peoples.

This is a common matrix in the Old Testament prophetic writings: God sends His prophets to warn the people that they need to make urgent changes: They don’t. God warns them again and they don’t listen. God sends another prophet who pronounces His judgment (like Hosea, who was by no means Israel’s first warning). God’s prophet tells the people who are soon to face God’s judgment that a better day is coming for everybody in Christ.

Posted in Bible | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

The Next Step

We begin today with our look at those Greek words that are translated into English as “worship”:

proskyneo to do reverence, or homage by kissing the hand; in NT to do reverence or homage by prostration; to pay divine homage, worship, adore, to bow one’s self in adoration*

From this word we have our English word “prostrate” as in ‘to prostrate oneself before the throne of God’. The word is used a total of 60 times in the New Testament, of which 9 are references to the Old Testament worship, 30 relate to an individual’s personal worship in one form or another, 21 are Apocalyptic references in Revelation to Old Testament worship forms. There are no direct uses relative to the New Testament worship assembly. An example of its use can be found in John 4:24:

God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth

sebō to stand in awe; to venerate, reverence, worship, adore; worshiping, devout, pious, a term applied to proselytes to Judaism*

This word is used 10 times in the New Testament, all of which refer to individuals. An example is found in Acts 16:10:

One of those listening was a woman from the city of Thyatira named Lydia, a dealer in purple cloth. She was a worshiper of God. The Lord opened her heart to respond to Paul’s message.

latreia  service, servitude; religious service, worship*

 

This word is used 5 times in the New Testament, all referring to a religious service performed, 4 times in Old Testament contexts, one time in the New Testament context. As an example, Romans 12:1:

Therefore, I urge you, brothers and sisters, in view of God’s mercy, to offer your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and pleasing to God—this is your true and proper worship

(* Definitions from Mounce Interlinear New Testament)

If you look back at our foundation, we can see that our proper adoration, reverence and devotion to God is to offer ourselves as living sacrifices to Him in service. Yet here we are, right where we began: What form should our worship assembly take?

For most of us, we look to culture and tradition, and what we see is ceremonies and rituals of various types. Often, they are associated with rules, regulations and observances of one sort or another, but is that what God really wants from us? The ceremonies were big in the Old Testament worship, but in that case, they foreshadowed the coming of Christ. We no longer look forward to His coming; He has come already, and the ceremonies and rituals have been entirely fulfilled in Him− they are obsolete in our time. Paul gave us some guidance on human traditions:

Since you died with Christ to the elemental spiritual forces of this world, why, as though you still belonged to the world, do you submit to its rules: “Do not handle! Do not taste! Do not touch!”? These rules, which have to do with things that are all destined to perish with use, are based on merely human commands and teachings. Such regulations indeed have an appearance of wisdom, with their self-imposed worship, their false humility and their harsh treatment of the body, but they lack any value in restraining sensual indulgence.

Colossians 2:20-23

Our true and perfect worship both in and out of the assembly, is to offer ourselves as living sacrifices:

Therefore, I urge you, brothers and sisters, in view of God’s mercy, to offer your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and pleasing to God—this is your true and proper worship. Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.

Romans 12:1-2

As Christians it always comes back to this, whether we are looking at individual spiritual practices, corporate worship assemblies, or at how to deal with the challenges of everyday life.

With all of that said, I have two questions for the group:

  1. Why is it called, in Protestant circles anyway, a worship “service”?
  2. Is it possible for our group to come together to worship as one Body despite our different opinions, likes and dislikes?
Posted in Christian living | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments

A Brief Introduction to Hosea

Hosea began his prophetic ministry to the Northern Kingdom, Israel, in the final phase of Amos’ ministry, somewhere around 790 BC. It was a time of great material prosperity in the land, but socially and morally, it was a disaster; the Kingdom was coming apart. There was a series of assassinations, with several kings being murdered after only a short time in power, replaced by their killers, who in turn faced the same fate themselves: chaos and violence were afoot in the land.

As was the case with the Old Testament prophets in general, and like Amos before him, Hosea was sent to bring a message from God, a denunciation of the wickedness that was all the rage, and a warning that God would not stand idly by and watch it indefinitely.

Unlike Amos, who came from the Southern Kingdom, it would appear that Hosea was himself a Northerner who was intimately familiar with the situation there, yet this did nothing to cause the people to receive his message with any enthusiasm; in fact, they were in no mood to hear any sort of indictment from God, His messenger or from anyone else− they were in full self-destruct mode.

At about the same time that Hosea was ministering in the North, Isaiah was hard at work in the South with a similar message of the need to repent; his message wasn’t all that well received either as it happened, yet the two prophets themselves seemed to have reacted to all of this quite differently. While Isaiah remained strong and defiant, Hosea was more like Jeremiah in temperament, being quite grieved by the situation. One might even say that with his emphasis of love, he was of a frame of mind much like that of the Apostle John.

Israel’s day of reckoning came when Hosea was a very old man, in 722 BC when the Kingdom was overrun by the Assyrians and utterly destroyed. I think it’s safe to say that most people prefer to be right when they deliver a message or a warning, as Hosea had for so long. Yet his warnings had been rejected by the people, and now all was lost as a result. I rather doubt that Hosea was happy about having been right, rather I would imagine that having been ignored was probably much worse for him to bear than the disaster itself; he died shortly thereafter.

Posted in Bible | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Photo of the Week: June 27, 2018

Another great contribution from Bargo

Posted in Photo of the Week | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments