Paul’s Story Continues…

2-2014 097-LR

Then after fourteen years, I went up again to Jerusalem, this time with Barnabas. I took Titus along also. I went in response to a revelation and, meeting privately with those esteemed as leaders, I presented to them the gospel that I preach among the Gentiles. I wanted to be sure I was not running and had not been running my race in vain. Yet not even Titus, who was with me, was compelled to be circumcised, even though he was a Greek. This matter arose because some false believers had infiltrated our ranks to spy on the freedom we have in Christ Jesus and to make us slaves. We did not give in to them for a moment, so that the truth of the gospel might be preserved for you.

Galatians 2:1-5

And so Paul continues with his story, a story of his own Christian experience that he is sharing with the Galatians so that they will understand that those who were among them at the time teaching that a Gentile must become a Jew and be circumcised, before they can receive Christ, were wrong.  In this little chunk of his text, Paul recounts his visit to Jerusalem to consult with the other Apostles on this very subject.  Quite clearly, they all understood that the only way to salvation, for either Jew or Gentile, was faith in Jesus Christ. Circumcision was useless in matters pertaining to salvation, and was not to be taught.  There is an even larger principle in play here, and that is that we cannot add to the Gospel… not anything!  Thus, when people today want to add to the Gospel, whatever they are pushing is invalid.  Salvation is by faith alone.

As for those who were held in high esteem—whatever they were makes no difference to me; God does not show favoritism—they added nothing to my message. On the contrary, they recognized that I had been entrusted with the task of preaching the gospel to the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been to the circumcised. For God, who was at work in Peter as an apostle to the circumcised, was also at work in me as an apostle to the Gentiles. James, Cephas and John, those esteemed as pillars, gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship when they recognized the grace given to me. They agreed that we should go to the Gentiles, and they to the circumcised. All they asked was that we should continue to remember the poor, the very thing I had been eager to do all along.

Galatians 2:6-10

This is a really interesting little paragraph. Paul is really driving home the point that the leaders in Jerusalem were having no part in this business of requiring Gentiles to become Jews to receive Christ.  It is conjecture on my part, for the text doesn’t actually say it, but it appears to me that the false teachers among the Galatians must have been claiming that they had been sent from Jerusalem to teach “correctly.” This would certainly explain why Paul opened his letter without the usual formalities, and went directly to a condemnation of the false teachers.

This also brings up another interesting point for us to ponder. When is it OK for us to condemn someone?  You may recall that in our study of Peter’s letters, we saw that he did not advocate condemnation being heaped upon those who opposed the truth…

Recall that Peter was talking about those who denied the truth, and brought ridiculous accusations and ridicule against the truth.  They were non-believers. Paul is dealing with false teachers who were perverting the Gospel of Jesus Christ: See the difference? Those who scoff at the Gospel are different from those who pervert it, for a scoffer is easy to recognize, and one can simply consider the source and disregard their rantings.  A false teacher, on the other hand can cause tremendous damage not only to an individual believer, but the entire Body of Christ. You might consider our recent three-part series called “Based on a True Story” in which false teachings not only caused divisions, but turned brothers against one another. These guys are supposed to be followers of Christ, the scoffing unbeliever just doesn’t understand… yet.  That is a huge difference!

Finally, note also that Paul didn’t just open fire at the false teachers; he went all the way to Jerusalem, not by catching a quick flight, to make absolutely certain of his position before condemning anyone. If Paul had to be certain, I would suggest that might go double for you and I, and I’m confident that you’d agree,

Unknown's avatar

About Don Merritt

A long time teacher and writer, Don hopes to share his varied life's experiences in a different way with a Christian perspective.
This entry was posted in Christian Life and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Paul’s Story Continues…

  1. paulfg's avatar paulfg says:

    Always love walking with your eye and your ear for the Word of God. And one phrase stood out this morning: “to spy on the freedom we have in Christ Jesus and to make us slaves”

    (btw – have your clocks gone forwards/backwards?) 🙂

  2. 2l2phant's avatar 2l2phant says:

    Thank you for sharing 🙂

  3. Pingback: I refuse to carry a cross | Just me being curious

  4. Great article Don. But one correction to your information: Paul wrote and sent the letter to the Galatians before the Council at Jerusalem. Just for your edification. I found this compelling myself when I learned this fact. What really threw me for a loop was right after the Council at Jerusalem, Paul had Timothy circumcised! (Acts 16)The reason is obvious: Timothy had a Jewish mother and a Greek father; Paul didn’t want anything to stand between them and the gospel to be presented in the synagogues first. The Jews would instantly be offended by an uncircumcised man…especially since his mother was Jewish! Circumcision was not necessary for salvation but even Paul said that he would become all things to all people that he could win more to Christ. Timothy acquiesced to the request and the rest is history. It just amazes me that people would be privy to such private information! It’s not like whipping our your driver’s license…how did they know?! Just sayin’…

    • Don Merritt's avatar Don Merritt says:

      Maybe I’m confused, but as I recall, Paul’s views were confirmed by the Council; interesting point in any case. How would they know about Timothy? I’ve posed the same question myself, but apparently they would have known. It would seem that our notions of “modesty” aren’t quite the same as theirs.

Leave a reply to disciplegideon Cancel reply