Jesus and the Law

Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.

Matthew 5:17-20

Lest anyone should have the wrong idea about Jesus, He takes the opportunity at the this point to clarify His relationship with the Law of Moses, pointing out very clearly that He had no intention of abolishing it. As we read this, we might wonder why He stuck this paragraph at this point in His remarks; the answer is an interesting one. As He has gone out proclaiming the Kingdom of Heaven, healing the sick and chasing out demons, Jesus created quite a stir to say the least. He has given us the character traits of the new follower of God, He has shown us a new mission for God’s people in the last section, but even though there are new elements He is introducing into Israel, He is not doing away with any part of the old Law; no, He has something quite different in mind.

He is going to fulfill both the Law and the Prophets!

Notice that in this passage, Jesus is still mentioning the Kingdom; in the Kingdom, people won’t be approaching the Law in the same way that they have been used to handling it, and it may well be that the people have never really handled it correctly, or as God intended. The reason for this is simply that the Israelites had the idea that they could become righteous by keeping the Law by their own force of will, and as we know, they were never successful for long and often fell into total rebelliousness when they failed. In this implication throughout the rest of this sermon, Matthew once again is linking the story of Jesus with the history of Israel.

Entry into the Kingdom will require a great deal more than the Law as presented by the Pharisees and teachers of the law, for they taught obedience to Law through legalistic minutia, a teaching that God did not bring to them. As the larger story unfolds, we will see time and again their legalistic approach colliding with Jesus’ kingdom approach, for they simply could not fathom His teaching, for Jesus’ approach was to rely in faith upon God for righteousness, rather than on earning it by their own efforts, and frankly, this conflict is still with us today.

Beginning with 5:21, Jesus will teach His listeners how the Law should be applied towards one’s neighbors, which as we will see, runs a great deal deeper than anything the Pharisees had in mind, for their legalism by minutia was only effective in making a person look impressive to other people, while Jesus’ approach was allowing God to work in the lives of the people, to His glory.

Unknown's avatar

About Don Merritt

A long time teacher and writer, Don hopes to share his varied life's experiences in a different way with a Christian perspective.
This entry was posted in Bible and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Jesus and the Law

  1. Great post. I wrote a three part series on the Gospel Transition from Jew to Gentile, and I would love to have your comments and perhaps, corrections.

    It was an eye opener for me to realize that Jesus, though he interacted several times with non-Jews, He made it abundantly clear that he came only for the Lost Sheep of Israel, and furthermore, when he commanded his disciples to go out two by two to preach the Kingdom, he forbade them going to any Gentile or Samaritan city.

    And it wasn’t until Acts 16 when things really opened up to the Gentile bride, after the stoning of Stephen in Acts 7 or 8.

    Having this understanding (to me anyway) makes it much simpler to understand why He (Jesus) can seemingly accept the law and contradict it all at the same time. He was working on law bound legalists. It also explains why the ‘what must we do to be saved’ answer of Acts 2:38 changed by Acts 16.

    Some claim Acts 2:38 is the only approved method of becoming saved, yet after things transition to the Gentiles, Beleive on the Lord was the new answer to the question, ‘What must I do to be saved’.

  2. It seems to me that the 10 commandments were given to ‘saved’ people, who had been brought into covenant relationship with the God who saves. The sacrificial law was to remind the these ‘saved’ people that God’s salvation was bigger than mere social and political freedom from Egypt, and pertained to forgiveness of sins and peace with the God we had all offended. The curses of Deuteronomy were to warn these people not to depart from the God who saves. If they did, they could not be saved by the non-gods of the nations, and if they persisted in trusting gods who could not save, they would not be saved. Blessing only comes to bad people like us as we trust the God who saves.

  3. I wish there was a love button! This is a GREAT introduction into what is coming next!!

  4. Pingback: “JESUS AND THE LAW” 9/26/2017 Posted by Don Merritt for “The Life Project” | God's group

Leave a comment