Now the first covenant had regulations for worship and also an earthly sanctuary. A tabernacle was set up. In its first room were the lampstand and the table with its consecrated bread; this was called the Holy Place. Behind the second curtain was a room called the Most Holy Place, which had the golden altar of incense and the gold-covered ark of the covenant. This ark contained the gold jar of manna, Aaron’s staff that had budded, and the stone tablets of the covenant. Above the ark were the cherubim of the Glory, overshadowing the atonement cover. But we cannot discuss these things in detail now.
Hebrews 9:1-5
Chapter 9 opens with a brief description of the Old Testament Tabernacle and its contents which would have been quite familiar to the Jewish readers of this letter. As you can see, it is not the author’s purpose here to go into any great detail on this subject, for he is heading in a more important direction, and I will follow his lead in this post. If you would like more information, please see the link below for the Class Notes on chapter 9 where you will find a chart that lists the OT components and their NT counterparts…
When everything had been arranged like this, the priests entered regularly into the outer room to carry on their ministry. But only the high priest entered the inner room, and that only once a year, and never without blood, which he offered for himself and for the sins the people had committed in ignorance. The Holy Spirit was showing by this that the way into the Most Holy Place had not yet been disclosed as long as the first tabernacle was still functioning. This is an illustration for the present time, indicating that the gifts and sacrifices being offered were not able to clear the conscience of the worshiper. They are only a matter of food and drink and various ceremonial washings—external regulations applying until the time of the new order.
Hebrews 9:6-10
Verses 6-7 continue with the author’s brief description of the scene in the tabernacle, culminating in the annual entrance of the high priest into the Most Holy Place; notice that he had an offering for his own sins, as well as for all of the people. I point this out because it is a tell-tale sign that the ministry of Jesus is completely different than that of the Old Covenant priests, and should convey to us that Jesus is not and will never be an Old Covenant priest.
Verse 8 marks the point where the author shifts from his description of the tabernacle into his application of this information. See the words “the Holy Spirit was showing by this…”? The author is telling us that as long as the Old Covenant was in effect, the reality of Jesus was not yet in force. Please take note that the opposite is also true: Now that Jesus has finished His work, the Old Covenant is no longer in effect, and never will be again. Why do I keep pointing this out? Because millions of our dear brothers and sisters in Christ are still looking forward to the day when the Old Covenant Temple is rebuilt, and the Old Covenant sacrificial system is once again practiced, with the understanding that Jesus Himself will one day be that high priest who enters the Most Holy Place… and that simply cannot be!
Look at the next verse: “This is an illustration for the present time…” All of the things that went on in the Temple were illustrations, even the Temple itself was an illustration. An illustration represents the reality pictured, but an illustration is never the reality itself. The gifts and offerings in the old Temple worship could never clear the conscience of the worshippers, because they could never take sin away, for in the final analysis, they only involve earthly things. Now pay careful attention to what he says next: external regulations applying until the time of the new order. These are very interesting “eternal regulations” for they have an expiration date attached; how can that be? Yes, I’ve even had a comment or two along these lines… how can something “everlasting” be over?
Let’s think… these Temple ceremonies and sacrifices are meant to illustrate something. They illustrate an eternal truth that Man needs salvation from sin. When that salvation was accomplished once for all time by Jesus on the cross, the illustration is not longer necessary, but the truth they once illustrated remains: Man needs salvation from sin, only now, we have found it in the work of Jesus on the cross.
You see, that wasn’t really so hard to understand, was it? The illustration that was the Old Covenant is over because the eternal reality of what it illustrated has come to pass… simple.

Reading this post, the walk through Hebrews, the continual reference to a desire amongst some to hang on to the old. I wonder if the “Chosen People” and the thousands of years of baggage going with that may not be a core issue. That “we are one” and all are born again, all are saved by grace, with the emphasis on all – whereas Chosen People in the accepted sense is of “old” rather than new. And whether that culture and history, tradition and “the glory days”, are more a motivator for this confusion than is scripture.
In the UK we used to be The Empire, then Great Britain, now the UK, and maybe soon England, Scotland, Ireland and Wales. There has been and still is, a yearning for the glory days. That we are still a world power. Yet this empire was a culture and tradition based on trade.
The Chosen People is a tradition built on God, from God and of God. ” We Are One” dismisses that heritage in earthly terms. “Jewish = Chosen People = God” still seems to underpin this wish to hold onto the old. To be an elite. And by association, those not born into, yet approving of – they by association join the elite. So the new covenant? No more elite, no ,more born into, no more by association with. That is a lot to give up. Just like the rich man.
Paul, you’ve given us some food for thought here, and some perspective that many Americans, certain this American, might not have though about before. I’m still mulling some of this over…I will tell you why I keep pointing certain things out on this tour of Hebrews. I know you aren’t a fan of academic answers, so I’ll try not to get too carried away here!
Theologically speaking, Hebrews accomplishes a number of things in today’s climate, and I’m speaking of application here. For one thing, it calls into serious question systematic theologies that are built upon premises that allow for various distinctions between the Old and New Covenants to be blurred, and thus had unfortunate consequences over the centuries. In addition, Hebrews shines the bright light of day on some doctrinal positions that result in all sorts of divisive impulses in the larger Body of Christ, as you saw recently, and finally Hebrews and its clear delineation between Old and New Covenants expose the central error of premillennialism which is rampant in certain circles today with the effect that it pulls attention away from God’s expressed purpose for His followers… and all of this is based on blurring the Covenants, something which in my view cheapens what Jesus did for us.
I’m going to hear about it now! 🙂
Don, thank you for allowing this comment. Crossed my mind reading these verses and your words … The bible does not – can not – operate or live in a spiritual bubble. It will always be connected. To culture, tradition, fashion, lifestyle and popular opinion. Simply because we, it’s readers are. Faith is a big percentage yet the other elements are entwined sand confuse and complicate. Unravelling that as you do requires faith to be greater than all other elements. For there is truth is god is love. And that might help explain why simple is so complicated. No other nation – other than the Irish – seem to see it as such an important badge of honour (in my experience of meeting people)
Interesting… maybe you can tell us more about that some time; I’m intrigued